Bitcoin in DeFi Requires Trusting Someone With Your BTC
Bitcoin is the world’s largest crypto asset by market cap. Yet borrowing against it in DeFi almost always means handing it to someone else first:Give your BTC to a custodian or a signer set
WBTC is held by BitGo. One company controls the keys. BitGo can be hacked, regulated, or go bankrupt. In 2023, concerns about custodianship triggered $1B+ in WBTC redemptions in a single week. tBTC uses a threshold signature network. A sufficient coalition of signers could theoretically collude. The trust assumption is distributed, but it is still a trust assumption. Stacks sBTC uses a committee of signers to peg and unpeg BTC. The peg mechanism relies on off-chain coordination that must be trusted. In every case, you are trusting humans with your Bitcoin.Or leave Bitcoin altogether
The alternative is to sell or bridge BTC onto another chain, which turns it into a different asset with a different set of risks: bridge contracts, peg mechanisms and the custody behind them. Every bridge adds a place where the BTC can be lost.The Market Left 900 Million People Behind
An estimated 77% of Bitcoin holders have never participated in DeFi. Not because they don’t want yield on their BTC. Because:- They don’t want to give up custody.
- They don’t want to trust a bridge or a wrapped token.
- The UX of wrapped BTC across multiple chains is too complex.
What Doesn’t Exist Yet
There is currently no protocol that is simultaneously:- Trustless - BTC secured by Bitcoin Script itself, not by any human or committee
- Native - real BTC that never leaves Bitcoin, verified on-chain by an SPV light client, with no bridge and no wrapped token
- On Stellar - where native USDC lives
Next: How Writz Works →